Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
DiscussionReflection

What Humans Need

David Loxterkamp
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2023, 21 (5) 465-467; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3015
David Loxterkamp
Seaport Community Health Center, Belfast, Maine
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.loxterkamp@gmail.com
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Family medicine is a champion of human-focused health care in the context of lasting relationships. What do humans need—those who seek care and those who offer it? Respect, understanding, and kindness. Without it, more money, more ancillary personnel, more time-saving technology cannot lift us from the profession’s doldrums. The author believes that the deep desire to be of help to others can be rekindled in an office culture where the humanity in all of us is honored.

Key words:
  • office culture
  • humanism
  • doctor-patient relationship
  • practice transformation
  • family medicine

Every day and without fanfare, patients are leaving the family practice where I have worked many years. They are transferring to other practices, going to urgent care centers and emergency departments, or simply giving up on the idea of seeing a doctor. Staff turnover is high, and many of those who stay are unhappy and contemplate leaving. Prospective applicants go elsewhere to do other things that better suit their lifestyle or pocketbook. This, of course, is not just a problem at my job; it permeates primary care. And it cannot be solved (just) by raising salaries, hiring more ancillary staff, or investing in labor-saving technology.

Four years ago, I left my continuity practice to teach in a nearby residency program. I am now back on a part-time basis. With fewer responsibilities and more time for reflection, I can see how the practice is failing to meet the needs of our patients—and over the years, little by little, how I failed them, too.

Primary care is the business of changing lives. Our job is to help acutely ill patients recover, chronically ill patients maintain control, and people who are making self-destructive choices make better ones. It is a human enterprise: people helping people.

To do this effectively requires attention to the humanity of our work. What do humans need? Ask them. Patients need to feel acknowledged, respected, and welcomed. Caregivers want a work environment where they can make individualized decisions, improve their skills, and feel like they are making a difference in the lives of others. Not surprisingly, when we care for patients in the right kind of way, we are caring for ourselves, too.

Returning to that right kind of way is neither complicated nor expensive. It involves putting people before protocol, sacrifice before ease, common sense before blind obedience, and local wisdom before centralized decision making. The old-fashioned values of service, personal responsibility, camaraderie, and the Golden Rule flourish when the conditions are right.

The late Tony Hsieh, founder of Zappos, famously said that “while our brand has come to be known for delivering the very best customer service, the number one priority is actually not customer service. Our priority is company culture, and our belief is that if we get the culture right, most of the other stuff—such as delivering great customer service or building an enduring brand or business—will happen as a natural by-product of our culture.”1

What kind office culture can attract the idealist, retain the hard worker, engage the curious, lead the team, and foster a sense of connection between the caregiver and those they care for? Gauging by the level of burnout in many primary care practices, it is a rare and fragile thing. But not hard to imagine. It comes around to what humans need, especially when they are ill or worried: they want to be greeted by a person, enter an office scaled for intimate interaction, see their own doctor, express themselves in an unhurried and unscripted way, and be trusted to make good decisions about their own health care. The human touch benefits us all, and is supported by the evidence.

Human Greeting

The telephone is the primary means of accessing the doctor’s office; most calls concern the need for an appointment, prescription refill, or clarification of instructions.2 When wait times are long, staff is unfriendly, or needs go unmet,3 the disgruntled patient responds by doing nothing (ie, giving up) or making unintended trips to the office or emergency department.4

There is nothing more welcoming to an anxious patient than a human voice on the other end of the line. Too often, a call to the doctor’s office begins with an automated message. But the patient may not know who or what service they need. Long wait times and errant transfers only heighten the frustration. Moreover, an automated system cannot re-assess the need for an office visit or prescription refill. But people in a call center can, especially when they are onsite and integrated into the office flow.

Human Scale

Practices with under 10 physicians have far fewer preventable admissions than do larger practices, especially among high needs beneficiaries.5,6 Smaller practices are also associated with higher rates of patient satisfaction and accessibility.10,11

The larger the office, the greater the number of job titles, the more likely that an order will fall through the cracks, and the less likely it will be noticed. Referrals, refills, orders, and messages are all better served by small, organized, and cross-trained teams. The total number of office employees should never exceed their ability to know each other on a first-name basis. And that ability is thwarted when staff turnover is high.

Human Continuity

Greater usual provider continuity (UPC) is associated with better clinical outcomes, lower utilization of urgent care (including hospitalizations and emergency department visits), decreased spending, better patient experience, greater physician wellness, and improved equity in access and utilization of health care services.5-7

Continuity of care with one’s usual provider is considered a pillar of primary care. Yet the desire for it is conditional. Younger patients with a single, minor concern will happily see the next available clinician. Older adults with multiple problems and a long prescription list want to see “their” doctor, especially when they are ill or worried. But somewhere along the way, the desire for “quick access” subverted the goal of continuity. And did so needlessly, for both goals can be met if there are sufficient same-day slots. Moreover, when continuity physicians see their own patients for an acute illness, they keep their pledge to “be there” for their patients and watch as they recover.

Human Conversation

Diagnostic accuracy is sacrificed when doctors focus solely the chief complaint, because in doing so they overlook critical data.12 When patients are allowed to tell their story, it provides not only more information, but also builds trust, promotes healing, and secures a connection between the doctor, patient, and health care team.13-17

There is no substitute for unhurried, nonlinear, and unscripted story telling. It is the way that human beings convey the meaning of life events. It takes time for stories to unfold, time that must be guarded and protected in office visits as well as staff meetings. Conversations expose the frustration and disappointment, confusion and worry that bind us to medicine, but also the small victories, moments of gratitude, and humor that lighten our day.

Human Potential

Office culture plays an important role in our ability to make good clinical decisions,18 prevent burnout,19 and adopt improvement strategies.20

Motivation is key to behavioral change. Daniel Pink championed a “science of motivation” in his popular Ted-Talk21 and book22 He observes that laborers who perform mechanical tasks will increase their production when offered bonuses. But for those whose job requires even a modicum of cognitive input, monetary rewards can lead to negative results. Pink asserts that professionals are happiest and most productive when they are given some control over their work environment, allowed to master skills, and believe that their efforts are leading to positive change. This closely aligns with Edward Deci and Richard Ryan’s theory of self-determination.23

In the process of implementing the Patient-Centered Medical Home and confronting the epidemic of burnout, we learned a lot about organization style and practice culture. Clear goals matter. Buy-in matters. Paced implementation, measurement, and feedback matter. But what matters most is a workforce with enough agency, mastery, and purpose to care for the needs of the community.

I know what you are thinking: that an exhausted staff has neither the inclination nor capacity for change. And that our bosses would never agree to take the financial risk. They remind us that economy lies in size, standardization, and the centralization of authority. We must remind them that there is a cost to replace unhappy staff, clinicians, and patients.

An old sage once wrote that “a stitch in time saves nine.”24 Our inboxes are full of the unfilled needs of our patients: for sympathy, reassurance, and guidance. Why not provide it to them up front instead of indirectly through a flurry of prescriptions, tests, and referrals? Just as it takes money to make money, it takes time to save time.

Even if the office never changes, doctors still control certain important aspects of their career. We decide which organization to join. We decide what kind of example we will set in the office. William Carlos Williams reminds us that “the nature of a hello or good-bye, the tone of voice as a question is asked or answered, the private thoughts one has, and the effect they have on our face, our hands as they do their work” still matters to our patients and colleagues.25 Finally, we decide how long we’ll stay. And while sometimes it is in our best interest to leave, patients are always sorry to see us go.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique physician treats a unique patient, whom he or she comes to understand and care for in a unique way. Doctors, and those who hire them, must trust that age-old formula. What’s at stake here is the basic human desire to help others and to put their good before our own. Success in primary care seldom hinges on the right prescription, the right procedure, or the right algorithm; it is put at risk by the inanimate barriers we have built into our practice. We are a profession of humans helping humans. That is the story of medicine.

Acknowledgment

This essay was written while I was a resident scholar in November, 2022. I wish to thank the Robert Graham Center and the Center for Professionalism and Value in Healthcare for their guidance and support.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: author reports none.

  • Read or post commentaries in response to this article.

  • Received for publication December 10, 2022.
  • Revision received April 18, 2023.
  • Accepted for publication April 25, 2023.
  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Logan D,
    2. King J,
    3. Fisher-Wright H.
    Tribal Leadership: Leveraging Natural Groups to Build a Thriving Organization. Harper Business; 2011.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Nason JC.
    Telephone Usage at Mercy Hospital’s Primary Care Practices [capstone]. Portland, Maine: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; 2015. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/muskie_capstones/100/
  3. 3.↵
    1. LaVela SL,
    2. Gering J,
    3. Schectman G,
    4. Weaver FM.
    Optimizing primary care telephone access and patient satisfaction. Eval Health Prof. 2012; 35(1): 77-86. doi:10.1177/0163278711411479
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Locatelli SM,
    2. LaVela S,
    3. Talbot ME,
    4. Davies ML.
    How do patients respond when confronted with telephone access barriers to care? Health Expect. 2015; 18(6): 2154-2163. doi:10.1111/hex.12184
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Casalino LP,
    2. Pesko MF,
    3. Ryan AM, et al.
    Small primary care physician practices have low rates of preventable hospital admissions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33(9): 1680-1688. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0434
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Casalino LP,
    2. Ramsay P,
    3. Laurence C.
    4. Baker LC,
    5. Pesko MF,
    6. Shortell SM.
    Medical group characteristics and the cost and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. Health Serv Res. 2018; 53(6): 4970-4996. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Edwards P.
    Bigger practices are associated with decreased patient satisfaction and perceptions of access. Brit J Gen Prac. 2022; 72(722): 420-421. doi:10.3399/bjgp22X720521
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.
    1. Loxterkamp D.
    Small is beautiful: health care with a human face. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021; 34(2): 264-265. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.210014
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.
    1. Yang Z,
    2. Ganguli I,
    3. Davis C, et al.
    Physician - versus practice - level primary care continuity and association with outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries. Health Serv Res. 2022; 57(4): 914-929. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13999
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mittelstaedt TS,
    2. Mori M,
    3. Lambert WE,
    4. Saultz JW.
    Provider practice characteristics that promote interpersonal continuity. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013; 26(4): 356-365. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2013.04.120306
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Loxterkamp D.
    The lost pillar: does continuity of care still matter? Ann Fam Med. 2021; 19(6): 553-555. doi:10.1370/afm.2736
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Nendaz MR,
    2. Raetzo MA,
    3. Junod AF,
    4. Vu NV.
    Teaching diagnostic skills: clinical vignettes or chief complaints? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2000; 5(1): 3-10. doi:10.1023/A:1009887330078
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Novick DR.
    Sit back and listen: the relevance of patients’ stories to trauma-informed care. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(22): 2093-2094. doi:10.1056/NEJMp180963
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.
    1. Groopman G.
    Why storytelling is part of being a good doctor. The New Yorker. Published Jul 25, 2022. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/07/25/why-storytelling-is-part-of-being-a-good-doctor-all-that-moves-us-jay-wellons
  15. 15.
    1. Lown BA,
    2. Dayron R.
    Lost in translation? How electronic health records structure communication, relationships, and meaning. Acad Med. 2012; 87(4): 392-394. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318248e5ae
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.
    1. Barrier PA,
    2. Li JT,
    3. Jensen NM.
    Two words to improve physician-patient communication: what else? Mayo Clin Proc. 2003; 78(2): 211-214. doi:10.4065/78.2.211
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Robinson JD,
    2. Tate A,
    3. Heritage J.
    Agenda-setting revisited: when and how do primary-care physicians solicit patients’ additional concerns? Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 99(5): 718-723. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Shackelton R,
    2. Link C,
    3. Marceau L,
    4. McKinlay J.
    Does the culture of a medical practice affect the clinical management of diabetes by primary care providers? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009; 14(2): 96-103. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008124
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Edwards ST,
    2. Marino M,
    3. Solberg LI, et al.
    Cultural and structural features of zero-burnout primary care practices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021; 40(6): 928-936. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02391
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Scammon DL,
    2. Tabler J,
    3. Brunisholz K, et al.
    Organizational culture associated with provider satisfaction. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014; 27(2): 219-228. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.120338
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Pink D.
    The puzzle of motivation. TED. Aug 25, 2009. https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_pink_the_puzzle_of_motivation?language=en
  22. 22.↵
    1. Pink D.
    Drive: The Surprising Truth about What Motivates Us. New York, NY: Riverhad Books; 2009.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ryan RM,
    2. Deci EL.
    Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York, NY: The Guildford Press; 2017.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Williams WC.
    The Doctor Stories. New Directions; 1984.
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ben Franklin
    . Poor Richard’s Almanack. Peter Pauper Press; 1980.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (5)
Vol. 21, Issue 5
September/October 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What Humans Need
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
What Humans Need
David Loxterkamp
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2023, 21 (5) 465-467; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
What Humans Need
David Loxterkamp
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2023, 21 (5) 465-467; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3015
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Day I Almost Walked Away: Trust, Gratitude, and the Power of Teamwork
  • What Are Doctors For? A Call for Compassion-Based Metrics as a Measure of Physician Value
  • The Shoeshine Stand and the Renaissance of Primary Care
Show more Reflection

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Community / population health
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Continuity
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • Organizational / practice change
    • Communication / decision making
    • Mindfulness and reflection

Keywords

  • office culture
  • humanism
  • doctor-patient relationship
  • practice transformation
  • family medicine

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine