HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental data: Appendix In Brief TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment TRACK Discussion: View Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nutting, P. A. Articles by Dietrich, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nutting, P. A. Articles by Dietrich, A.

Care Management for Depression in Primary Care Practice: Findings From the RESPECT-Depression Trial

¹ The Center for Research Strategies, Denver, Colorado
² Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora
³ Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire
⁴ Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Paul A. Nutting, MD, MSPH, The Center for Research Strategies, 225 E. 16th Ave, Ste 1150, Denver, CO 80203, Paul.Nutting{at}CRSLLC.org

PURPOSE This qualitative study examined the barriers to adopting depression care management among 42 primary care clinicians in 30 practices.

METHODS The RESPECT-Depression trial worked collaboratively with 5 large health care organizations (and 60 primary care practices) to implement and disseminate an evidence-based intervention. This study used semistructured interviews with 42 primary care clinicians from 30 practice sites, 18 care managers, and 7 mental health professionals to explore experience and perceptions with depression care management for patients. Subject selection in 4 waves of interviews was driven by themes emerging from ongoing data analysis.

RESULTS Primary care clinicians reported broad appreciation of the benefits of depression care management for their patients. Lack of reimbursement and the competing demands of primary care were often cited as barriers. These clinicians at many levels of initial enthusiasm for care management increased their enthusiasm after experiencing care management through the project. Psychiatric oversight of the care manager with suggestions for the clinicians was widely seen as important and appropriate by clinicians, care managers, and psychiatrists. Clinicians and care managers emphasized the importance of establishing effective communication among themselves, as well as maintaining a consistent and continuous relationship with the patients. The clinicians were selective in which patients they referred for care management, and there was wide variation in opinion about which patients were optimal candidates. Care managers were able to operate both from within a practice and more centrally when specific attention was given to negotiating communication strategies with a clinician.

CONCLUSIONS Care management for depression is an attractive option for most primary care clinicians. Lack of reimbursement remains the single greatest obstacle to more widespread adoption.

Key Words: Depression • care management • chronic care model • primary health care • health care teams

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. C. Stange In This Issue: Mental Health and Care Management, Health Behavior Change, and Reflection in Primary Care Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: